ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2023
Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of Euvichol-Plus with Shanchol in healthy Indian adults and children: an open-label, randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, parallel-group, phase 3 trial.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of oral cholera vaccine (Euvichol-Plus) effectiveness againstBMJ global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Considering the cholera menace in India and to seek licensure of the oral cholera vaccine (OCV), Euvichol-Plus, we conducted a clinical trial to compare the immunogenicity and safety of Euvichol-Plus with Shanchol in healthy Indian adults and children. Methods: This phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority, parallel-group, comparative study was conducted at seven sites across India involving 416 healthy adults (aged ≥18-60 years) and children (aged ≥1 to <18 years). Healthy individuals who agreed to participate through a voluntary written informed consent form along with oral or written assent (for children aged 7-18 years) were included. No assent was required for those <7 years, as consent was given by the legally acceptable representatives (LAR). Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive two doses of either Euvichol-Plus or Shanchol orally, 14 days apart. The first dose (1.5 ml) was administered on visit 1, and the second dose at 2 weeks after the first dose during visit 2. Participants were followed up telephonically for 3 consecutive days after each visit and returned for final assessment at 2 weeks after the second dose (visit 3). Blood samples were collected for immunogenicity assessment, and safety analyses were done during all the visits. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was the percentage of participants with ≥4-fold increase in anti- Findings: The study was performed in two age cohorts: cohort 1 (aged ≥18-60 years, 208 participants [104 in Euvichol-Plus group and 104 in Shanchol group]), and cohort 2 (aged ≥1 to <18 years, 208 participants [104 in Euvichol-Plus group and 104 in Shanchol group]). A total of 414 participants (Euvichol-Plus: 206 and Shanchol: 208) who completed the study (intention-to-treat and per-protocol set) were analysed to compare the vibriocidal titre as an index for immunogenicity. At 2 weeks after the second dose, the percentage of participants in the Euvichol-Plus group who reported a ≥4-fold increase in anti- Interpretation: Euvichol-Plus appears to be non-inferior to Shanchol in terms of immunogenicity and safety in healthy Indian adults and children. Funding: Techinvention Lifecare Private Limited, Mumbai, India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.