Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076697›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2023

A narrative review of digital biomarkers in the management of major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant forms.

Annarita Vignapiano, Francesco Monaco, Claudio Pagano, Martina Piacente, Federica Farina, Gianvito Petrillo, Raffaella Sica, Alessandra Marenna, Jae Il Shin, Marco Solmi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Annarita Vignapiano *Department of Mental Health, Salerno, Italy.
Francesco Monaco *Department of Mental Health, Salerno, Italy.
Claudio PaganoDipartimento di Scienze Aziendali-Managment e Innovation Systems, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Martina PiacenteEuropean Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno (EBRIS), Salerno, Italy.
Federica FarinaEuropean Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno (EBRIS), Salerno, Italy.
Gianvito PetrilloInnovation Tecnology e Sviluppo (I.T. Svil), Salerno, Italy.
Raffaella SicaDepartment of Mental Health, Salerno, Italy.
Alessandra MarennaEuropean Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno (EBRIS), Salerno, Italy.
Jae Il ShinDepartment of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Marco SolmiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ontario, ON, Canada.
Giulio CorrivettiDepartment of Mental Health, Salerno, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Depression is the leading cause of worldwide disability, until now only 3% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) experiences full recovery or remission. Different studies have tried to better understand MDD pathophysiology and its resistant forms (TRD), focusing on the identification of candidate biomarkers that would be able to reflect the patients' state and the effects of therapy. Development of digital technologies can generate useful digital biomarkers in a real-world setting. This review aims to focus on the use of digital technologies measuring symptom severity and predicting treatment outcomes for individuals with mood disorders. Methods: Two databases (PubMed and APA PsycINFO) were searched to retrieve papers published from January 1, 2013, to July 30, 2023, on the use of digital devices in persons with MDD. All papers had to meet specific inclusion criteria, which resulted in the inclusion of 12 articles. Results: Research on digital biomarkers confronts four core aspects: (I) predicting diagnostic status, (II) assessing symptom severity and progression, (III) identifying treatment response and (IV) monitoring real-word and ecological validity. Different wearable technologies have been applied to collect physiological, activity/sleep, or subjective data to explore their relationships with depression. Discussion: Depression's stable rates and high relapse risk necessitate innovative approaches. Wearable devices hold promise for continuous monitoring and data collection in real world setting. Conclusion: More studies are needed to translate these digital biomarkers into actionable interventions to improve depression diagnosis, monitoring and management. Future challenges will be the applications of wearable devices routinely in personalized medicine.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigital biomarkersmajor depressive disordermental healthcarepersonalized treatmentwearable devices

Identifiers

PMID38076697
PMCPMC10701678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.