Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076688›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Assessing empathy in healthcare services: a systematic review of South American healthcare workers' and patients' perceptions.

Jeel Moya-Salazar, Eliane A Goicochea-Palomino, Jorge Porras-Guillermo, Betsy Cañari, Alexis Jaime-Quispe, Nahomi Zuñiga, María Jesús Moya-Salazar, Hans Contreras-Pulache

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Empathy Quandary in Postgraduate Medical Training.International journal of applied & basic medical research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeel Moya-SalazarFaculties of Health Science, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Peru.
Eliane A Goicochea-PalominoSchool of Biomedical Engieneering, Faculties of Engineering, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima, Peru.
Jorge Porras-GuillermoDigital Transformation Center, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Betsy CañariDigital Transformation Center, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Alexis Jaime-QuispeDigital Transformation Center, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Nahomi ZuñigaDigital Transformation Center, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
María Jesús Moya-SalazarDigital Transformation Center, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Hans Contreras-PulacheDigital Transformation Center, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Empathy in healthcare service refers to the ability of healthcare workers (HCWs) to put themselves in patients' shoes, which is necessary to ensure a good physician-patient relationship and provide quality care. Various studies have shown that empathy varies depending on the country, the instrument used, the evaluator, and the HCW's specialty. This systematic review aims to estimate the levels of empathy among HCWs in South American countries between 2000 and 2019. Methods: We conducted searches in 15 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scielo, PsycoInfo, ScientDirect, Latindex, and LILIACS), four preprint servers (medRxiv, bioRxiv, SportRxiv, and Preprints), and other search engines such as Dimensions (20), Google Scholar, Yahoo!, and Alicia CONCyTec (c). We followed the PRISMA guidelines, and this study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023454007). Results: Out of 18,532 documents identified from November 10 to 28, 2021, 10 articles were included (n = 2,487 participants, of which 1989 were patients). Among the studies focusing on self-evaluated empathy, four relied on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for medical professionals (JSE-HP). However, assessments from patients employing Jefferson Scale of Patient's Perceptions of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) and Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) scale suggested high levels of empathy We found that both professionals and patients perceived that empathic care was provided, often at a medium or regular level. Surgery residents presented lower levels of empathy compared to obstetrics-gynecology and pediatrics physicians. Conclusion: Empathy is crucial in determining the quality of care and patient satisfaction during healthcare services provided by HCWs. Therefore, it is important to support professionals so that the various stressful situations they encounter in their work and daily life do not negatively influence the approach they provide to patients.

Indexed as

empathyhealthcare workershealth servicesphysician-patient relationsquality of health careSouth America

Identifiers

PMID38076688
PMCPMC10704173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.