Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076661›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2023

Guidelines for an optimized differential centrifugation of cells.

Mohammad Sharifian Gh, Fatemeh Norouzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Utilizing an In Vitro Fermentation Model to Assess Probiotics onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Bioprocess Engineering for Cultivated Meat.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad Sharifian GhDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Fatemeh NorouziDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

Tear Protein Microbial RegulationR01EY026171 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LAURIE, GORDON WILLIAM · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
Lacritin Regulation of Homeostasis and Ocular Surface HealthR01EY032956 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LAURIE, GORDON WILLIAM · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026171NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature reviews reveal a significant deficiency in conceptual comprehension concerning centrifugation, a crucial step in both medical and research protocols. The arbitrary fluctuations in centrifugal forces present a potential threat to the reproducibility of results. To address this, we propose concise guidelines that integrate key factors such as temperature, osmolarity, fluid volume, and viscosity. These guidelines aim to enhance comprehension of optimal sedimentation conditions for cell suspensions. Additionally, we introduce a standardized protocol for determining the optimal RCF and centrifugation time. The goal is to maximize sedimentation efficiency while minimizing cell damage, contributing to a universally applicable and reproducible method in centrifugation practices.

Indexed as

CellCentrifugationOptimum sedimentation

Identifiers

PMID38076661
PMCPMC10709023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.