Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076643›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Patient-reported outcomes used actively in cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment: A mini-review of the Danish landscape.

Helle Pappot, Gry Assam Taarnhøj, Line Bentsen, Rasmus Blechingberg Friis, Christina Bæksted, Mille Guldager Christiansen, Cecilie Holländer-Mieritz, Pia Krause Møller, Ida Marie Lind Rasmussen, Trine Lund-Jacobsen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychometric validation of the Danish cancer caregiver roles and responsibilities scale.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Systematic nurse-led consultations based on electronic patient-reported outcomes for women with endometrial or ovarian cancer during chemotherapy-a feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Helle PappotDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Gry Assam TaarnhøjDepartment of Oncology and Palliative Care, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød, Hillerød, Denmark.
Line BentsenDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Rasmus Blechingberg FriisDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Christina BækstedDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Mille Guldager ChristiansenDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Cecilie Holländer-MieritzDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Pia Krause MøllerDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Ida Marie Lind RasmussenDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Trine Lund-JacobsenDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dag Rune StormoenDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Lærke K TolstrupDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKAfrican Palliative Care Association · UGGentofte Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Many studies using Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data have been conducted to monitor symptoms and health-related quality of life during follow-up after cancer treatment. However new ways of using (e)PROs have emerged. We aimed to explore the Danish landscape of the use of PRO in a research setting, where PRO is used actively in cancer patients undergoing treatment, and give an overview of how it is embraced by patients and clinicians. Methods and materials: A literature search was performed in June 2023, using the keywords Denmark, cancer, and patient-reported outcomes. An expert on literature searches identified the search terms, and double screening was performed at both abstract and screening levels and full-text stage. The software tool Covidence was used. Results: 467 articles were retrieved and 19 studies were included. They described the type of ePRO instrument used and the application of active ePRO i.e. a dialogue tool in the clinical encounter, release of alerts to clinicians, and enhancement of self-management. Finally, a development in the use of active ePROs over time is elucidated and we show how it is embraced by patients and clinicians. Conclusion: This mini-review gives an overview of how ePRO solutions are tested in oncological research in Denmark and embraced by patients and clinicians. ePRO solutions in a Danish setting seem well-suited for self-management. However, if more impact is warranted, clinicians need to engage in reviewing and using ePROs. Moreover, for successful implementation, the integration of ePROs in electronic health records must be supported by IT specialists and management.

Indexed as

EHealthEPROPatient perspectivePatient-reported outcomesPatient satisfactionPREMPROPROM

Identifiers

PMID38076643
PMCPMC10704259
OpenAlexW4389279523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.