Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076640›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2023

Clinical Complete Response After Conversion Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Is Salvage Hepatectomy Necessary?

Jia-Yi Wu, Jun-Yi Wu, De-Yi Liu, Han Li, Shao-Wu Zhuang, Bin Li, Jian-Yin Zhou, Jing-Yao Huang, Zhi-Bo Zhang, Shu-Qun Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prognostic Value of Pathological Response After Conversion Therapy and Salvage Surgery in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jia-Yi Wu *Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5371-8989
Jun-Yi Wu *Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
De-Yi Liu *Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Han Li *Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Shao-Wu ZhuangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Bin LiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Vascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Yin ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4396-4518
Jing-Yao HuangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Bo ZhangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Shu-Qun LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Mao-Lin YanShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Yao-Dong WangShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine whether salvage hepatectomy offers prognostic advantages for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after conversion therapy. Methods: A total of 74 consecutive uHCC patients with cCR after conversion therapy at seven major cancer centers in China between October 2018 and December 2021 were included. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the influence of potential confounders. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between the surgical group and the non-surgical group. Results: Before PSM, 45 patients received salvage hepatectomy, and 29 patients received nonsurgical treatment. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS rates were 77.8%, 61.5%, and 61.5% in the surgical group and 81.2%, 60.9%, and 60.9% in the non-surgical group, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 92.9%, 92.9%, and 69.7% in the surgical group and 100%, 70%, and 70% in the non-surgical group, respectively. There were no statistical differences in DFS and OS between groups [hazard ratio (HR)=0.715, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.250-2.043, p=0.531; HR=0.980, 95% CI: 0.177-5.418, p=0.982, respectively]. After PSM, 26 pairs of patents were selected; there remained no significant differences in DFS and OS between these two groups (HR=1.547, 95% CI: 0.512-4.669, p=0.439; HR=1.024, 95% CI: 0.168-6.242, p=0.979, respectively). Conclusion: Through the study, it tend to show that salvage hepatectomy may be not essential for uHCC patients with cCR, especially for patients with a high risk of surgical complications. Prospective trials with long term follow-up are warranted to evaluate this treatment option.

Indexed as

conversion therapydisease-free survivalhepatocellular carcinomaoverall survivalsalvage surgery

Identifiers

PMID38076640
PMCPMC10710241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.