Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076629›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Efficacy and safety of MP1032 plus standard-of-care compared to standard-of-care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a multicentre, randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2a trial.

Petra Sager, Astrid Kaiser, Sara Schumann, Beate Ludescher, Michael Niedermaier, Ivo Schmidt, Katharina Och, Christiane Dings, Thorsten Lehr, Wolfgang Brysch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Efficacy of MP1032 in hospitalised patients with COVID-19.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Petra SagerMetrioPharm Deutschland GmbH, Am Borsigturm 100, 13507, Berlin, Germany.
Astrid KaiserMetrioPharm Deutschland GmbH, Am Borsigturm 100, 13507, Berlin, Germany.
Sara SchumannMetrioPharm Deutschland GmbH, Am Borsigturm 100, 13507, Berlin, Germany.
Beate LudescherMetrioPharm Deutschland GmbH, Am Borsigturm 100, 13507, Berlin, Germany.
Michael NiedermaierMetrioPharm Deutschland GmbH, Am Borsigturm 100, 13507, Berlin, Germany.
Ivo SchmidtMetrioPharm Deutschland GmbH, Am Borsigturm 100, 13507, Berlin, Germany.
Katharina OchSaarmetrics GmbH, Starterzentrum 1, Universität des Saarlandes, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Christiane DingsSaarmetrics GmbH, Starterzentrum 1, Universität des Saarlandes, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Thorsten LehrSaarmetrics GmbH, Starterzentrum 1, Universität des Saarlandes, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Wolfgang BryschMetrioPharm Deutschland GmbH, Am Borsigturm 100, 13507, Berlin, Germany.
Saarland University · DEDebiopharm (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 infections still have a significant impact on the global population. The existing vaccinations have contributed to reducing the severe disease courses, decreasing hospitalisations, and lowering the mortality rate. However, due to the variability of COVID-19 symptoms, the emergence of new variants and the uneven global distribution of vaccines there is still a great need for new therapy options. One promising approach is provided by host-directed therapies. We assessed here the efficacy and safety of MP1032, a host-directed anti-viral/anti-inflammatory drug in hospitalised patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Methods: In a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase IIa study, patients were randomised 2:1 to receive either 300 mg MP032 bid + Standard-of-Care (SoC) or placebo bid + SoC for 28 days. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and had moderate to severe COVID-19 symptoms. The study spanned 20 sites in six countries (Bulgaria, France, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Spain), assessing disease progression according the NIAID scale as the primary outcome on day 14. Secondary objectives included disease progression (day 28), disease resolution (days 14 and 28), mortality rate, COVID-19 related parameters and safety. Exposure-response analyses were performed, linking MP1032 to COVID-19 biomarkers (eGFR, D-dimer). Findings: 132 patients were enrolled to receive MP1032 + SoC (n = 87) or placebo + SoC (n = 45). The patients were all white or Caucasian with a mean (median) age of 60.5 (63) years. Overall, only 10 patients were vaccinated, 5 in each group. No significant risk difference of disease progression could be detected between groups on both day 14 (9.8% MP1032 vs. 11.6% placebo) and day 28 with MH common risk differences of -0.276% (95% CI, -11.634 to 11.081; p = 0.962) and 1.722% (95% CI, -4.576 to 8.019; p = 0.592), respectively.The treatment with MP1032 + SoC was safe and well-tolerated. Overall, 182 TEAEs including 10 SAEs were reported in 53.5% (46/86) of patients of the verum group and in 57.8% (26/45) of patients of the placebo group; the SAEs occurred in 5.8% (5/86) and 6.7% (3/45) of verum and placebo patients, respectively. None of the SAEs was considered as related. Interpretation: Despite the study's limitation in size and the variation in concurrent SoCs, these findings warrant further investigation of MP1032 as a host-directed anti-viral drug candidate. Funding: The study was funded by the COVID-19 Horizon Europe work programme and MetrioPharm AG.

Indexed as

Anti-infectiveAnti-inflammatoryCovid-19Host-directed therapyPandemic preparedness

Identifiers

PMID38076629
PMCPMC10704330
OpenAlexW4389370003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.