ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2023
Surgical outcomes and survival of patients over 80 years old who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Among patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy, the proportion of patients aged ≥80 years has increased. This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes and survival of patients aged ≥80 years who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer and identify independent factors that affect postoperative survival. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 1,066 patients aged ≥65 years with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection between January 2014 and December 2018 at a single institution. They were divided into those aged ≥80 years (old-elderly group) and 65-79 years (young-elderly group). Their clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared. Results: Of the 1,066 patients, 136 (12.8%) were 80 years or older. Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification and more advanced cancers were observed in the old-elderly group than in the young-elderly group. No significant difference in postoperative complications was found between the groups. At a median follow-up of 49.1 months, the 5-year overall survival rate after surgery for the old-elderly group was lower than that for the young-elderly group (75.6% Conclusion: Old-elderly patients aged ≥80 years had comparable postoperative outcomes and disease-specific survival to the young-elderly group, suggesting that curative gastrectomy can be considered a viable option for octogenarian patients with gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.