Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076506›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2023

Effectiveness of an extraoral cold and vibrating device in reducing pain perception during deposition of local anesthesia in pediatric patients aged 3-12 years: a split-mouth crossover study.

Ashveeta Shetty, Shilpa S Naik, Rucha Bhise Patil, Parnaja Sanjay Valke, Sonal Mali, Diksha Patil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashveeta ShettyDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, D.Y. Patil Deemed to be University, School of Dentistry, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2048-1588
Shilpa S NaikDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, D.Y. Patil Deemed to be University, School of Dentistry, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5660-5952
Rucha Bhise PatilDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, D.Y. Patil Deemed to be University, School of Dentistry, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-4181
Parnaja Sanjay ValkeDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, D.Y. Patil Deemed to be University, School of Dentistry, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-3813
Sonal MaliDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, D.Y. Patil Deemed to be University, School of Dentistry, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9358-1429
Diksha PatilDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, D.Y. Patil Deemed to be University, School of Dentistry, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9957-7732
D.Y. Patil University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Local anesthetic injections may induce pain in children, leading to fear and anxiety during subsequent visits. Among the various approaches recommended to reduce pain, one is the use of a Buzzy Bee™ device that operates on the concept of gate control theory and distraction. The literature regarding its effectiveness during the deposition of local anesthesia remains limited; hence, the aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy of extraoral cold and vibrating devices in reducing pain perception during the deposition of local anesthesia. Methods: A split-mouth crossover study in which 40 children aged 3-12 years requiring maxillary infiltration or inferior alveolar nerve block for extractions or pulp therapy in the maxillary or mandibular posterior teeth were included. The control intervention involved the application of topical anesthetic gel for one minute (5% lignocaine gel), followed by the administration of local anesthetic (2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline) at a rate of 1 ml/minute. Along with the control protocol, the test intervention involved using the Buzzy Bee™ device for 2 minutes before and during the deposition of the local anesthetic injection. The heart rate and face, legs, arms, cry, and consolability revised (FLACC-R) scale scores were recorded by the dentist to assess the child's pain perception. Results: The mean age of the participants in Group A and Group B was 7.050 ± 3.12 years and 7.9 ± 2.65 years respectively. A reduction in the mean heart rate and FLACC-R score was observed during the deposition of local anesthetic solution in the tissues when the Buzzy Bee™ was used in both groups at different visits in the same subjects (P < 0.05) The Buzzy Bee™ device was effective in reducing the heart rate and FLACC-R scores when used during maxillary infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block local anesthesia techniques (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of extraoral cold and vibrating devices significantly reduces pain perception during local anesthetic deposition in pediatric patients. Considering the results of this study, the device may be incorporated as an adjunct in routine dental practice while administering local anesthesia in children.

Indexed as

BuzzyFLACC-R ScaleLocal AnesthesiaPainPediatric DentistryVibration

Identifiers

PMID38076506
PMCPMC10703555
OpenAlexW4389292230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.