Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076501›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2023

Effect of audio distraction with thermomechanical stimulation on pain perception for inferior alveolar nerve block in children: a randomized clinical trial.

Devendra Nagpal, Dharanshi Viral Amlani, Pooja Rathi, Kavita Hotwani, Prabhat Singh, Gagandeep Lamba

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Devendra NagpalDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, V.S.P.M's Dental College and Research Center, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2290-2745
Dharanshi Viral AmlaniDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, V.S.P.M's Dental College and Research Center, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3997-2769
Pooja RathiDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, V.S.P.M's Dental College and Research Center, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-0283
Kavita HotwaniDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, V.S.P.M's Dental College and Research Center, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2280-9842
Prabhat SinghDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, V.S.P.M's Dental College and Research Center, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7018-7988
Gagandeep LambaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, V.S.P.M's Dental College and Research Center, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-3709
P.M.N.M. Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pain control is a crucial aspect of pediatric dentistry for patient management. Thermo-mechanical devices (Buzzy™ Pain Care Labs, USA) work on the concept of vibration and cooling and have shown promising results in pain control during local anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. On the other hand, audio distraction has also been used for pain management. The amount of pain endured is determined by the patient's perception and attentiveness. Thus, if audio function is added to the thermomechanical device it might increase its efficiency. Hence, the present study aimed to compare pain on injection using a thermo-mechanical device with and without audio during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) injection in children aged 5-10 years old. Methods: Twenty-eight children aged between 5 and 10 indicated for IANB were included in this randomized study. Children who were undergoing the dental procedure were divided into 2 groups, with 14 children in each group. The study group was the thermo-mechanical device with audio distraction; the control group was the thermo-mechanical device without audio distraction. IANB was administered. Subjective pain evaluation was performed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPR) and objective pain evaluation was done using the Faces, Leg, Activity, Consolability, Cry (FLACC) scale. Results: The outcome depicted a significant reduction in pain on injection for both objective and subjective evaluations in the thermo-mechanical device with an audio distraction group. Conclusions: Less pain on injection was observed, when a thermo-mechanical device was used with audio distraction for IANB procedures.

Indexed as

Audio DistractionExternal CoolingInferior Alveolar NerveNerve BlockPrimary MolarsVibration

Identifiers

PMID38076501
PMCPMC10703554
OpenAlexW4389292276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.