ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2024
Deep learning
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vivo Demonstration of Deep Learning-Based Photoacoustic Visual Servoing System.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Deep Learning to Localize Photoacoustic Sources in Three Dimensions: Theory and Implementation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Miniaturized side-firing intracardiac photoacoustic imaging catheter for monitoring radiofrequency ablation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Interventional cardiac procedures often require ionizing radiation to guide cardiac catheters to the heart. To reduce the associated risks of ionizing radiation, photoacoustic imaging can potentially be combined with robotic visual servoing, with initial demonstrations requiring segmentation of catheter tips. However, typical segmentation algorithms applied to conventional image formation methods are susceptible to problematic reflection artifacts, which compromise the required detectability and localization of the catheter tip. Aim: We describe a convolutional neural network and the associated customizations required to successfully detect and localize Approach: We trained a network with simulated photoacoustic channel data to identify point sources, which appropriately model photoacoustic signals from the tip of an optical fiber inserted in a cardiac catheter. The network was validated with an independent simulated dataset, then tested on data from the tips of cardiac catheters housing optical fibers and inserted into Results: When validated with simulated data, the network achieved an Conclusions: These results demonstrate the promise of the proposed method to identify photoacoustic sources in future interventional cardiology and cardiac electrophysiology applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.