Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076437›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Improving bioenergy recovery from municipal wastewater with a novel cloth-filter anaerobic membrane bioreactor.

Neriamara Martins-West, Ana Martin-Ryals, Bryan Maxwell, Lance Schideman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neriamara Martins-WestIllinois Sustainable Technology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.
Ana Martin-RyalsUniversity of Florida, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Bryan MaxwellIllinois Sustainable Technology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.
Lance SchidemanIllinois Sustainable Technology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USFlorida Agricultural and Mechanical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) have been used for treating high-strength industrial wastewater at full-scale and the potential to use them for mainstream municipal wastewater treatment presents an important opportunity to turn energy-intensive plants into net-energy producers. However, several limitations of the AnMBR technology have prevented their adoption in the municipal wastewater industry, namely, high membrane cleaning energy demand and low membrane flux. This study demonstrated a novel AnMBR configuration that uses a commercially available cloth filter technology to address the key limitations of cleaning energy and membrane flux. The cloth filter anaerobic membrane bioreactor (CFAnMBR) is comprised of an anaerobic fixed-film bioreactor coupled with a cloth filter membrane with nominal pore size of 5 µm. The pilot CFAnMBR was operated for 150 days through the winter at a municipal wastewater plant in central Illinois (minimum/average influent temperature 5/13°C). The CFAnMBR increased membrane flux by more than 2 orders of magnitude (3,649 ± 1,246 L per meter squared per hour) and reduced cleaning energy demand by 78%-92% (0.0085 kWh/m

Indexed as

anaerobic digestionAnMBRbioenergycloth filterdecarbonizationmembranemunicipal wastewater

Identifiers

PMID38076437
PMCPMC10702774
OpenAlexW4388940727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.