Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076403›Full record

ArticleInfectious medicine2023

Coverage rates for diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, and pertussis age-specific booster recommendations in France: 2018 update of the real-world cohort analysis.

Régis Verdier, Clarisse Marchal, Manon Belhassen, Marie Le Pannerer, Nicole Guiso, Robert Cohen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Régis VerdierSanofi, Lyon, France.
Clarisse MarchalPELyon (Pharmaco Epidemiology Lyon), Lyon, France.
Manon BelhassenPELyon (Pharmaco Epidemiology Lyon), Lyon, France.
Marie Le PannererSanofi, Lyon, France.
Nicole GuisoIndependent Expert, Paris, France.
Robert CohenUniversité Paris Est, IMRB-GRC GEMINI, Créteil, France.
Sanofi (France) · FRAssociation Clinique et Thérapeutique Infantile du Val de Marne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The French National Immunization Program was updated in 2013 for vaccination against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and poliomyelitis. Our previous findings on the evolution of age-specific booster vaccination coverage rates (VCRs) up to 2017 suggested suboptimal vaccination coverages due to the pre-2013 recommendation-residual vaccination practices. In the current analysis, we evaluated all age-specific booster VCR and distribution of age at vaccination visits in 2018. In this retrospective observational cohort study, the cumulative booster VCRs were updated at all vaccination visits up to 2018 among the people who were eligible for a booster vaccination, using a 1/97th random sample of French national healthcare reimbursement databases. The cumulative booster VCR for individuals from all age groups increased from 2017 to 2018, except for 85-years-old vaccination visit. Majority of the individuals from all age groups were vaccinated (boosted) with a vaccine containing the pertussis valence. In 2018, sharp peaks corresponding to the recommended ages for booster vaccination visits were observed for individuals aged 6, 11 to 13, 25, 45, and 65 years. Our study reiterates suboptimal coverages in France and implies the need for booster vaccination throughout life for the protection of the population.

Indexed as

Booster vaccineDTaP-IPVFranceNational Immunisation ProgrammePertussisVaccination coverage rate

Identifiers

PMID38076403
PMCPMC10699673
OpenAlexW4313435375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.