Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076392›Full record

ArticleOpen access journal of contraception2023

Adherence to Modern Contraceptives Among Female Refugee Adolescents in Northern Uganda: A Prospective Single Cohort Study.

Ritah Bakesiima, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Amanda Cleeve, Elin C Larsson, Rose Chalo Nabirye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access journal of contraception, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ritah BakesiimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-4616-3799
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6516-1444
Jolly Beyeza-KashesyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mulago Specialised Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Amanda CleeveDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elin C LarssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rose Chalo NabiryeDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEBusitema University · UGKarolinska Institutet · SEMulago Hospital · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Contraceptive adherence is the current and consistent use of a contraceptive method as prescribed by a health worker or family planning provider so as to prevent pregnancy. Globally, adherence is lowest among adolescents. This has greatly contributed to the high burden of adolescent pregnancies. Adherence and reasons for discontinuation among refugee adolescents are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the rates and predictors of adherence to modern contraceptives among female refugee adolescents in northern Uganda. Methods: This was a prospective single cohort study, nested into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of peer counselling on acceptance of modern contraceptives. The RCT was conducted among female refugee adolescents in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda. The study involved 272 new starters of modern contraceptives who were followed up for six months from May 2019 to January 2020. The outcome was measured at one, three, and six months after receiving a contraceptive method, and the predictors of adherence were determined using Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE). Data were analysed using STATA version 14.0. Results: Adherence rates were low and reduced over time. By the end of the six months, only 44% of the participants were using a contraceptive method. Participants using long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) were more likely to adhere compared to those who were using short-acting reversible contraceptives (SARC) (OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.914-5.937, Conclusion: Adherence to modern contraceptives was low, leaving adolescents at risk of unintended pregnancies. Participants using LARC were more likely to adhere than those using SARC. Interventions addressing fear of side effects and partner prohibition should be studied and implemented to enable adherence to modern contraceptives.

Indexed as

adolescentscontraceptive adherencecontraceptive discontinuationrefugeesteenage pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38076392
PMCPMC10700036
OpenAlexW4389237050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.