Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076374›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Liver Biopsy: Missing the Limitations in the Hype.

Narendra S Choudhary, Swapnil Dhampalwar, Sukrit Sud, Zubin D Sharma, Bimal Sahu, Neeraj Saraf, Randhir Sud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Narendra S ChoudharyInstitute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Swapnil DhampalwarInstitute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Sukrit SudInstitute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Zubin D SharmaInstitute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Bimal SahuInstitute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Neeraj SarafInstitute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Randhir SudInstitute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy is increasingly being performed at several centers. It is also being promoted at endoscopy conferences. The currently available literature does not support the routine use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy as results are either inferior or comparable to percutaneous liver biopsy. We discuss the technical limitations of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy when compared to percutaneous liver biopsy and the comparative studies in the current review. The routine use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy should be discouraged as it may get less tissue, the complication rate is similar and it is more costly.

Indexed as

diagnostic accuracyendoscopic ultrasoundendoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsypercutaneous liver biopsytissue acquisition

Identifiers

PMID38076374
PMCPMC10709297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.