ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology
Donor Evaluation Protocol for Live and Deceased Donors.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploratory Analysis of Liver Tissue and Preservation Fluid Biomarkers (β-Hydroxybutyrate and Arginase) in Relation to Graft Steatosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Three Decades of Living Liver Donor Outcomes: A National Cohort Analysis of Patterns in Mortality and Recovery.Journal of transplantation · 2026Article
- Standardized evaluation protocols for deceased and living liver donors: a practical framework for emerging liver transplant programs.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Review
- Augmenting conventional criteria: a CT-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for early recurrence risk stratification in hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Perspectives and Tools in Liver Graft Assessment: A Transformative Era in Liver Transplantation.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Donor evaluation is a critical step before proceeding with liver transplantation (LT) in both deceased donor LT (DDLT) and living donor LT (LDLT). A good, healthy graft is necessary for the success of the transplantation. Other issues in selecting a donor include the transmission of infections and malignancies from the donor. Because of the scarcity of cadaver organs, an increasing number of extended-criteria donors, or 'marginal donors', are being utilized. LDLT also has potential risks to the donor, and donor safety needs to be kept in mind before proceeding with LT. The current review highlights the factors to be considered during donor evaluation for living and deceased donors before LT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.