Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076345›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2023

How sex affects the sinus rhythm heartbeat.

Danny Veen, Corina Schram-Serban, Mathijs van Schie, Frank van Schaagen, Paul Knops, Maryam Kavousi, Yannick Taverne, Natasja M S de Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Men and women's hearts don't beat the same: Epicardial mapping of Bachmann's bundle.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  2. Sex differences in atrial potential morphology.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  5. Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danny VeenDept of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Corina Schram-SerbanDept of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Mathijs van SchieDept of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank van SchaagenDept of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Paul KnopsDept of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Maryam KavousiDept of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Yannick TaverneDept of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Natasja M S de GrootDept of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is increasing awareness of sex-specific differences in epidemiology and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is, however, unknown whether males and females differ in atrial electrophysiological properties during sinus rhythm (SR). The aim of this study was therefore to investigate sex-based (regional) differences in electrophysiological properties during SR of the right (RA) and left (LA) atrium including Bachmanns Bundle (BB) and pulmonary vein region (PVA). Methods: Intra-operative, high resolution mapping during SR was performed in 53 matched females with males (without a history of AF), to measure lines of conduction block (CB), continuous conduction delay and block (cCDCB), conduction velocities (CV), total atrial activation times (TAT), unipolar potential voltages and percentage of low voltage areas (LVA). Results: Compared to males, females have significantly 1) lower unipolar potential voltages and slower CV at both RA and BB, 2) more LVAs, CB and cCDCB lines and longer CB and cCDCB lines at the RA only (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Electrophysiological properties of the atria during SR differ between males and females. These sex-based differences are particularly present at the RA and to a lesser degree at BB. In females, both the RA and BB contained more areas of conduction disorders and low voltage potentials. Future studies are required to investigate whether these areas play a role in sex-based differences in vulnerability to arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation.

Indexed as

Atrial mappingConduction disordersElectrophysiological propertiesSex differences

Identifiers

PMID38076345
PMCPMC10698247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.