ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2023
Intravesical
Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Omics Applications for Intervention Monitoring in Spinal Cord Injury.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Review
- Microbial dysbiosis and predictive neuroactive functional profiles in paediatric neurogenic bladder: an exploratory machine learning-based approach.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Exploring urinary microbiome: insights into neurogenic bladder and improving management of urinary tract infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- SWOT and Root Cause Analyses of Antimicrobial Resistance to Oral Antimicrobial Treatment of Cystitis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neurogenic bladder is associated with bacterial colonization and frequent urinary tract infections. Objectives: To explore the effects of one to two doses of intravesical Methods: This was a pilot substudy within an 18-month phase 1 clinical trial of self-instilled intravesical LGG for urinary symptoms as directed by the Self-Management Protocol using Probiotics (SMP-Pro). Urine samples were collected monthly when participants were asymptomatic. When SMP-Pro "trigger" symptoms (cloudier and/or more foul-smelling urine) occurred, urine samples were collected immediately pre-LGG instillation and 24 to 48 hours after LGG instillation. Urine was collected via a new catheter, immediately placed on ice/freezer, and processed within 12 hours. Genomic DNA was isolated, and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified and high throughput sequenced. Amplicon sequence variants were inferred and bacterial composition, community structure, and variation across clinical phenotypes were determined. Results: 126 urine samples were collected from 26 participants (SCI/D = 23; multiple sclerosis = 2; spina bifida = 1) between 20 and 57 years of age. The urobiomes were characterized by four dominant phyla (>1%): Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, which were comprised of six dominant genera (>3%): Conclusion: Among people with SCI/D who use IC, intravesical LGG alters the bacterial composition and diversity of the urine ecosystem, potentially disrupting the uropathogenic urobiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.