Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076274›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, and Spain: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Caitlin Thomas, Sikander Ailawadhi, Rakesh Popat, David Kleinman, Melissa M Ross, Boris Gorsh, Sarah Mulnick, Alicia O'Neill, Prani Paka, Maya Hanna and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell and Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Moving Into the Future.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Caitlin ThomasPatient-Centered Research, Evidera, London, United Kingdom.
Sikander AilawadhiDivisions of Hematology-Oncology and Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Rakesh PopatUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
David KleinmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Melissa M RossPatient-Centered Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Boris GorshGSK, Upper Providence, PA, United States.
Sarah MulnickPatient-Centered Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Alicia O'NeillGSK, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Prani PakaGSK, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Maya HannaGSK, Upper Providence, PA, United States.
Nicolas KrucienPatient-Centered Research, Evidera, London, United Kingdom.
Alexa MolinariGSK, Upper Providence, PA, United States.
Heather L GelhornPatient-Centered Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Sue PereraGSK, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Newer treatment options for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with efficacy and safety profiles that differ from traditional therapies have facilitated personalized management strategies to optimize patient outcomes. In the context of such personalized management, understanding how treatment characteristics influence patients' preferences is essential. This study assessed patients' preferences for RRMM treatment attributes and determined trade-offs between potential benefits, administration procedures, and adverse effects. Methods: Patients' preferences were evaluated using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Patients with RRMM who reported failing two lines of anti-myeloma treatment (immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor [PI]) or ≥ 3 lines (including ≥1 PI, immunomodulatory agent, or anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody), were recruited across the US, UK, Italy, Germany, France, and Spain. DCE attributes and levels were identified using a targeted literature review, a review of clinical data for relevant RRMM treatments, qualitative patient interviews, and input from clinical and myeloma patient experts. The DCE was administered within an online survey from February-June 2022. Preference data were analyzed using an error-component logit model and willingness to make trade-offs for potential benefits, and relative attribute importance scores were calculated. Results: Overall, 296 patients from the US ( Conclusion: Patients with RRMM were willing to tolerate increased risk of side effects for higher efficacy. Preferences and risk tolerance varied between patients, with preference patterns differing by certain patient characteristics. This highlights the importance of shared decision-making for optimal treatment selection and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

benefit–riskdiscrete choice experimentmultiple myelomapatient preferencestrade-offstreatment attributes

Identifiers

PMID38076274
PMCPMC10702501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.