ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Applying artificial intelligence to predict falls for inpatient.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning for diabetic foot care: accuracy trends and emerging directions in healthcare AI.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Investigating the Implementation and Impact of AI-Assisted Fall Prevention in Hospitals: Protocol for a Multicenter, Multimethod Observational Study in Sweden (SAFE).JMIR research protocols · 2026Observational
- Clinical characteristics and associated complications in diabetic patients with Grade 1 stress injury based on a TriNetX Retrospective Study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Image recognition-based detection system for preventing accidental dislodgement of head-and-neck medical supplies in ICU patients: A feasibility randomized controlled trial.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Stroke Severity Based on Collateral Circulation, Clinical Markers and Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Fall risk factors and mitigation strategies for hematological malignancy patients: insights from a qualitative study using the reason model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Post-surgical fall risk prediction: a machine learning approach for spine and lower extremity procedures.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: A rapid review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Organization of Nursing Care: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- A Systematic Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Where are We, and What's Next?Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
- Admission clinical and functional assessments for predicting inpatient fall risk using machine learning models.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Falls are adverse events which commonly occur in hospitalized patients. Inpatient falls may cause bruises or contusions and even a fractures or head injuries, which can lead to significant physical and economic burdens for patients and their families. Therefore, it is important to predict the risks involved surrounding hospitalized patients falling in order to better provide medical personnel with effective fall prevention measures. Setting: This study retrospectively used EHR data taken from the Taichung Veterans General Hospital clinical database between January 2015 and December 2019. Participants: A total of 53,122 patient records were collected in this study, of which 1,157 involved fall patients and 51,965 were non-fall patients. Primary and secondary outcome measure: This study integrated the characteristics and clinical data of patients with falls and without falls using RapidMiner Studio as an analysis tool for various models of artificial intelligence. Utilization of 8 differ models to identify the most important factors surrounding inpatient fall risk. This study used the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve to compute the data by 5-fold cross-validation and then compared them by pairwise t-tests. Results: The predictive classifier was developed based upon the gradient boosted trees (XGBoost) model which outperformed the other seven baseline models and achieved a cross-validated ACC of 95.11%, AUC of 0.990, F1 score of 95.1%. These results show that the XGBoost model was used when dealing with multisource patient data, which in this case delivered a highly predictive performance on the risk of inpatient falls. Conclusion: Machine learning methods identify the most important factors regarding the detection of inpatients who are at risk of falling, which in turn would improve the quality of patient care and reduce the workloads of the nursing staff when making fall assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.