Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076260›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2023

Exploring large language model for next generation of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology.

Kai Jin, Lu Yuan, Hongkang Wu, Andrzej Grzybowski, Juan Ye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kai Jin *Eye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Lu Yuan *Department of Ophthalmology, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Hongkang WuEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Andrzej GrzybowskiInstitute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland.
Juan YeEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, ophthalmology has advanced significantly, thanks to rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have emerged as powerful tools for natural language processing. This paper finally includes 108 studies, and explores LLMs' potential in the next generation of AI in ophthalmology. The results encompass a diverse range of studies in the field of ophthalmology, highlighting the versatile applications of LLMs. Subfields encompass general ophthalmology, retinal diseases, anterior segment diseases, glaucoma, and ophthalmic plastics. Results show LLMs' competence in generating informative and contextually relevant responses, potentially reducing diagnostic errors and improving patient outcomes. Overall, this study highlights LLMs' promising role in shaping AI's future in ophthalmology. By leveraging AI, ophthalmologists can access a wealth of information, enhance diagnostic accuracy, and provide better patient care. Despite challenges, continued AI advancements and ongoing research will pave the way for the next generation of AI-assisted ophthalmic practices.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceChatGPTdiagnostic accuracy and efficacylarge language modelophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID38076260
PMCPMC10701277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.