ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Association between the sarcopenia index and abnormal liver function in the adult population in the United States: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-exposure to heat and noise on workers' health: evidence from a large-scale cross-sectional surveillance study in China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The association between metabolic syndrome severity and frailty risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Article
- Effects of occupational dust exposure on the health status of workers in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association of two novel systemic inflammatory biomarkers and frailty based on NHANES 2007-2018.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to explore the association between the sarcopenia index and abnormal liver function in adult individuals in the United States. Methodology: This study employed a rigorous cross-sectional analysis of data derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted between 2017 and 2018. The primary objective was to investigate the correlation between the sarcopenia index and abnormal liver function. To achieve this, an advanced multivariate regression model was utilized, allowing for comprehensive analysis and meticulous adjustment of relevant variables. To ensure the robustness of the findings, a visually appealing smooth curve was constructed, and a two-stage regression model was applied for validation. Additionally, a detailed gender-stratified analysis was conducted to further explore the association between the sarcopenia index and abnormal liver function within distinct subgroups. Results: Through our rigorous participant selection process, a total of 1756 individuals were included in the study. The meticulously adjusted multivariate regression model revealed a significant negative association between the sarcopenia index and abnormal liver function, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.73 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.63 to 0.86. The robustness of this association was further supported by the visually appealing smooth curve plot. Moreover, in the gender-stratified subgroup analysis, after meticulous adjustment for confounding factors, notable differences in this association emerged (males: OR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.66-0.98; females: OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.79). Conclusion: This cross-sectional study yields robust evidence indicating a negative correlation between the sarcopenia index and abnormal liver function, predominantly observed among females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.