Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076097›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Advancing safe mobility: A global analysis of research trends in safe route planning.

Auwal Sagir Muhammad, Longbiao Chen, Cheng Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Auwal Sagir MuhammadFujian Key Laboratory of Sensing and Computing for Smart Cities (SCSC), School of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Longbiao ChenFujian Key Laboratory of Sensing and Computing for Smart Cities (SCSC), School of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Cheng WangFujian Key Laboratory of Sensing and Computing for Smart Cities (SCSC), School of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe route planning has become an increasingly important area of research in recent years due to growing concerns about pedestrian and traffic safety, rising traffic volumes and densities in urban areas, and advancements in smart vehicle and transportation technologies. This study conducted a bibliometric analysis of publications on safe route planning retrieved from the Web of Science database between January 2000 and January 2023 to understand the state of the field. A total of 1546 publications authored by 5423 researchers from 84 countries were analyzed. The findings identified the United States, China, India, South Korea, and Spain as the most productive countries, while the University of North Carolina emerged as the most productive organization. Engineering, computer science, transportation, public health, and automation were revealed to be the dominant initial research areas, although interest grew from other domains like urban planning and the environment over time. Analysis of publications by year showed a steady rise in output starting from 2008. Notable influential publications and highly cited authors in the field were also identified. Several research themes and terms like path planning, safety, walking, and route to school were highlighted through keyword analysis. This study provided novel insights into the evolving international landscape, topics, and influential contributors in safe route planning research over the past two decades. Limitations in database coverage and analytical techniques necessitate future work to enhance understanding in this critical domain.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisRoute findingSafe mobilitySafe route planningSafety

Identifiers

PMID38076097
PMCPMC10703627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.