ArticleHeliyon2023
Development and validation of machine learning based prediction model for postoperative pain risk after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application, performance and limitations of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and prediction of oro-facial pain: a systematic review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Pooled it
- "Beyond the scale: body mass index as a hidden player in post-extraction complications".BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Digital Dentistry in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review of Current Capabilities and Future Directions.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in tooth extraction: A systematic review.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Novel metaheuristic optimized latent diffusion framework for automated oral disease detection in public health screening.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Predicting postoperative pain risk in patients with impacted mandibular third molar extractions is helpful in guiding clinical decision-making, enhancing perioperative pain management, and improving the patients' medical experience. This study aims to develop a prediction model based on machine learning algorithms to identify patients at high risk of postoperative pain after tooth extraction. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study. Outpatients with impacted mandibular third molars were recruited and the outcome was defined as the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) score of peak postoperative pain within 24 h after the operation ≥7, which is considered a high risk of postoperative pain. We compared the models built using nine different machine learning algorithms and conducted internal and time-series external validations to evaluate the model's predictive performances in terms of the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-value. Results: A total of 185 patients and 202 cases of impacted mandibular third molar data were included in this study. Five modeling variables were screened out using least absolute selection and shrinkage operator regression, including physician qualification, patient self-reported maximum pain sensitivity, OHI-S-CI, BMI, and systolic blood pressure. The overall performance of the random forest model was evaluated. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the prediction model built using the random forest method were 0.879 (0.861-0.891), 0.857, and 0.846, respectively, for the training set and 0.724 (0.673-0.732), 0.667, and 0.600, respectively, for the time series validation set. Conclusions: This study developed a machine learning-based postoperative pain risk prediction model for impacted mandibular third molar extraction, which is promising for providing a theoretical basis for better pain management to reduce postoperative pain after third molar extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.