ArticleHeliyon2023
Willis covered stent treatment for internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm: A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pseudoaneurysm (PSA) of internal carotid artery is a rare but severe cerebrovascular disease and difficult to repair surgically. A novel medical device called Willis covered stent (WCS) has been created especially for the treatment of complex cerebrovascular diseases. However, the efficacy and safety of WCS therapy for PSA are still debatable. Additional substantial proof is needed. Methods: To find research pertaining to WCS treatment for PSA, a systematic review of literature was conducted in the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and CBM databases. The results comprising the data of intraoperative situation, postoperative situation, and follow-up were then included in a meta-analysis. Results: The criteria were met by 11 noncomparative studies with 152 patients and 157 PSAs. Technical success rate was nearly 100 % (>0.999 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.958, 1.000)), complete occlusion rate was 97.8 % (95 % CI, 0.932, 1.000), and side branch occlusion rate was 0.5 % (95 % CI, 0.001, 0.045). The rates of acute in-stent thrombosis (<0.001 (95 % CI, 0.000, 0.013)) and hemorrhage (<0.001 (95 % CI, 0.000, 0.005)) were both less than 0.1 %. In postoperative situation, surgery-related mortality rate was less than 0.1 % (<0.001 (95 % CI, 0.000, 0.005)). The rates of recurrence (<0.001 (95 % CI, 0.000, 0.002)) and parent artery stenosis (<0.001 (95 % CI, 0.000, 0.008)) were both less than 0.1 %, while late in-stent stenosis occurred in 1.3 % (95 % CI, 0.000, 0.053) of patients. In the end, 98.5 % (95 % CI, 0.943, 1.000) of patients had a good outcome. Conclusion: The application of WCS could be effective and safe for PSAs. The findings of this study could serve as a reference for upcoming clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.