Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076055›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Diagnostic efficacy of intraoperative histopathological examination of lesions with unknown diagnosis suspicious for malignancy.

Tevfik İlker Akçam, Ezgi Köse, Seda Kahraman Aydın, Ahmet Kayahan Tekneci, Dilara Özyiğit Büyüktalancı, Ayşe Gül Ergönül, Ali Özdil, Deniz Nart, Kutsal Turhan, Alpaslan Çakan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tevfik İlker AkçamEge University School of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, İzmir, Turkey.
Ezgi KöseEge University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Seda Kahraman AydınEge University School of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, İzmir, Turkey.
Ahmet Kayahan TekneciEge University School of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, İzmir, Turkey.
Dilara Özyiğit BüyüktalancıEge University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Pathology, İzmir, Turkey.
Ayşe Gül ErgönülEge University School of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, İzmir, Turkey.
Ali ÖzdilEge University School of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, İzmir, Turkey.
Deniz NartEge University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Pathology, İzmir, Turkey.
Kutsal TurhanEge University School of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, İzmir, Turkey.
Alpaslan ÇakanEge University School of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, İzmir, Turkey.
Ufuk ÇağırıcıEge University School of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, İzmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In this study, the efficiency of intraoperative histopathological examination (frozen section examination; FS) in patients operated per suspected lung malignancy was evaluated. Methods: The data of 136 patients who underwent surgery in our clinic due to suspected lung malignancy between January 2020 and June 2021 was evaluated prospectively. Results: The FS was inconclusive in 7.3 % of the 136 patients. In contrast, the accuracy of differentiating between benign and malignant lesions was 99.2 %, while the rate of false negative was 0.8 % in 126 patients with a prediagnosis. FS examination led to an accurate diagnosis in 91.9 % of the 98 patients without a history of extrapulmonary malignancy (EPM), with a false negativity rate of 1 %, whereas a paraffin-embedded examination was recommended in 7.1 %. The accuracy of the FS was 98.9 % in 91 patients prediagnosed based on an FS, with a false negativity rate of 1.1 %. In the same group of patients, the FS examination was successful in establishing the subtype in 32.9 % of the patients with primary lung cancer (PLC), whereas the efficacy of the FS examination in determining the subtype was better in benign diseases (63.6 % vs 32.9 %, p = 0.009). The FS examination was unable to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions in 92.1 % of patients with EPM but differentiated between primary and metastatic lesions in 48.3 % of patients who had malignancy. Furthermore, FS examination successfully guided surgery in 89 patients with no history of EPM (90.8 %) and 20 patients (52.6 %) with a history of EPM. Conclusion: Although FS is insufficient in subtyping lung cancers and distinguishing PLC and metastasis, it is an important and effective diagnostic approach with its overall ability to distinguish benign and malignant lesions and guiding surgical procedures.

Indexed as

Frozen sectionIntraoperative pathologyLung carcinomaLung resection

Identifiers

PMID38076055
PMCPMC10709377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.