Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076028›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2023

Cluster analysis for localisation-based data sets: dos and don'ts when quantifying protein aggregates.

Luca Panconi, Dylan M Owen, Juliette Griffié

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cluster parameter-based DBSCAN maps for image characterization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luca PanconiSchool of Mathematics, Centre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Dylan M OwenSchool of Mathematics, Centre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Juliette GriffiéDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many proteins display a non-random distribution on the cell surface. From dimers to nanoscale clusters to large, micron-scale aggregations, these distributions regulate protein-protein interactions and signalling. Although these distributions show organisation on length-scales below the resolution limit of conventional optical microscopy, single molecule localisation microscopy (SMLM) can map molecule locations with nanometre precision. The data from SMLM is not a conventional pixelated image and instead takes the form of a point-pattern-a list of the x, y coordinates of the localised molecules. To extract the biological insights that researchers require cluster analysis is often performed on these data sets, quantifying such parameters as the size of clusters, the percentage of monomers and so on. Here, we provide some guidance on how SMLM clustering should best be performed.

Indexed as

bioinformacticscluster analysisimage quantificationprotein aggregatessingle molecule localisation microscopy (SMLM)spatial point pattern (SPP)

Identifiers

PMID38076028
PMCPMC10704244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.