Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075977›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Intracranial pressure waveform in patients with essential hypertension.

Matheus Martins da Costa, Ana Luiza Lima Sousa, Mikaelle Costa Correia, Sayuri Inuzuka, Thiago Oliveira Costa, Priscila Valverde O Vitorino, Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza, Gustavo Frigieri, Antonio Coca, Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impaired Intracranial Compliance: A New Hypertension-Mediated Brain Organ Damage?High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  3. Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain compliance: a new assessment for clinical practice?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matheus Martins da CostaHypertension League-Cardiovascular Section and Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil.
Ana Luiza Lima SousaHypertension League-Cardiovascular Section and Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil.
Mikaelle Costa CorreiaHypertension League-Cardiovascular Section and Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil.
Sayuri InuzukaHypertension League-Cardiovascular Section and Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil.
Thiago Oliveira CostaHypertension League-Cardiovascular Section and Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil.
Priscila Valverde O VitorinoDepartment of Research, Pontifical Catholic University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil.
Polyana Vulcano de Toledo PizaDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Goiânia, Brazil.
Gustavo FrigieriMedical Investigation Laboratory 62, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Braincare Desenvolvimento e Inovação Tecnológica S.A. São Paulo, Brazil.
Antonio CocaHypertension and Vascular Risk Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Weimar Kunz Sebba BarrosoHypertension League-Cardiovascular Section and Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a strong association between hypertension and cerebrovascular diseases, but most of the mechanistic bases to justify this correlation remains misunderstood. Objective: To evaluate intracranial pressure waveform in long-term essential hypertensive patients with a non-invasive device, brain4care (b4c). Methods: Cross-sectional study in patients with hypertension. Office blood pressure was measured with an automatic oscillometric device. Intracranial pressure evaluation was acquired through a strain sensor that could detect and monitor nanometric skull bone displacements for each cardiac cycle. Under normal physiological conditions, P1 is greater than P2, and the normal P2/P1 ratio is <1. Time to peak (TTP) is the measurement in seconds of the beginning of waveform inscription until P1 and normal values are <0.20 s. The cut-off points ≥1.2 and ≥0.25 s were used to define intracranial hypertension (ICHT). Results: 391 consecutive patients were evaluated (75% female, mean age 64.3 ± 12.0 years). Mean value of P2/P1 ratio was 1.18 ± 0.25 and TTP 0.18 ± 0.63 s The obtained P2/P1 ratios were divided in three categories according to results of previous studies of normalcy (<1.0), intracranial compliance disturbance (1.0-1.19) and ICHT (≥1.2). Normal intracranial pressure was observed in 21.7% of patients, intracranial compliance disturbance in 32.7% and intracranial hypertension in 45.6%. Females showed a higher prevalence of ICHT (50.3%). Conclusion: The prevalence of 45.6% intra-cranial hypertension in patients with long-term hypertension, particularly in women, and in those over 65 years old, emphasizes the importance of evaluate intracranial pressure behaviour in these patients and raise a question concerning the real ability of cerebral autoregulation and vascular barriers to protect the brain.

Indexed as

brain vascular disorderscerebrovascular diseasescognitive disfunctionhypertensionintracranial pressure

Identifiers

PMID38075977
PMCPMC10702958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.