Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075964›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Effectiveness of a heart disease blended learning program in physiotherapy students: a prospective study.

Elena Marques-Sule, David Hernández-Guillén, Natalia Cezón-Serrano, Laura Arjona-Tinaut, Amalia Sillero-Sillero, Juan Luis Sánchez González, Ana Cobos-Rincón, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Elena Muñoz-Gómez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elena Marques-SulePhysiotherapy in Motion, Multispecialty Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
David Hernández-GuillénDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Natalia Cezón-SerranoPhysiotherapy in Motion, Multispecialty Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Laura Arjona-TinautDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Amalia Sillero-SilleroEscola Superior D'Infermeria del Mar (ESIMar), Parc de Salut Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan Luis Sánchez GonzálezDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Ana Cobos-RincónDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, Research Group GRUPAC, Logroño, Spain.
Raúl Juárez-VelaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, Research Group GRUPAC, Logroño, Spain.
Elena Muñoz-GómezDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Universitat de València · ESUniversidad de La Rioja · ESMunicipal Institute for Medical Research · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, novel teaching methodologies have been emerging with the aim of improving student learning. One of them is known as Blended Learning. BL allows educators to integrate elements of traditional face-to-face teaching with tailored online learning modalities, integrating the distinct strengths of both methodologies. Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of a heart disease blended learning program in undergraduate physiotherapy students. Methods: 124 participants (average age 21.20 ± 4.67 years, 58.87% female) performed an 8-week heart disease blended learning program that included face-to-face classes and online resources. Knowledge was assessed at baseline, at 4, 8, 12 and 20 weeks. Motivation and engagement were assessed at 4 and 8 weeks. Design of the instructions and learning behaviors were measured at 8 weeks. Finally, 108 subjects completed the study. Results: Knowledge significantly increased mid-program ( Conclusion: This program seems to be an appropriate methodology in future physiotherapists, since it improved knowledge and participants exhibited a high motivation and an adequate engagement, design of the program instructions and learning behaviors.

Indexed as

blended learningcardiologyeducationphysiotherapy studentsteaching methods

Identifiers

PMID38075964
PMCPMC10702954
OpenAlexW4388940595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.