Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075955›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

A simplified single transseptal puncture approach using high-density 3D voltage mapping for atrial fibrillation ablation: acute complications and long-term results.

Pedro Silva Cunha, Bárbara Lacerda Teixeira, Sérgio Laranjo, Guilherme Portugal, Bruno Valente, Ana Sofia Delgado, Mariana Pereira, António Condeixa Rocha, Manuel Brás, Madalena Coutinho Cruz and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Procedural outcomes of single versus double transeptal access for ablation of atrial fibrillation: Data from the NCDR Afib ablation registry.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro Silva Cunha *Arrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Bárbara Lacerda Teixeira *Arrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sérgio LaranjoArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Guilherme PortugalArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Bruno ValenteArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Sofia DelgadoArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mariana PereiraBiosense Webster, Lisbon, Portugal.
António Condeixa RochaBiosense Webster, Lisbon, Portugal.
Manuel BrásArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Madalena Coutinho CruzArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Margarida PauloArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana LousinhaArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cátia GuerraArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rui Cruz FerreiraArrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mário Martins Oliveira *Arrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Service, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Hospital de Santa Marta · PTSociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An ablation catheter and a circular mapping catheter requiring a double transeptal puncture (TSP) for left atrial access have been conventionally used for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, different operators have combined a single transseptal puncture technique with 3D high-density mapping catheters for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Objective: This study aims to compare two strategies, single vs. double TSP, regarding the duration of the procedure, radiation time, complication rates, and outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a large cohort of consecutive patients that underwent first PVI with radiofrequency energy (RF), using a point-by-point strategy, with a 3D mapping system, either with single or double TSP, according to the operator's choice. Results: 285 patients with a mean age of 59.5 ± 11.6 years (36.5% female, 67.7% paroxysmal AF) underwent a point-by-point catheter ablation with RF between July 2015 and March 2020. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1.7 ± 1.3. Single TSP was performed in 115 (40.3%) patients and double TSP in 170 (59.6%). The operator's experience (≥5 years of AF ablation procedures) was equally distributed among the two groups. The average procedure time (133 ± 31.7 min vs. 123 ± 35.5 min, for single and double TSP, respectively) did reach a statistical difference between both groups ( Conclusion: A simplified single-TSP technique using high-density multi-electrode 3D mapping is a safe and highly successful option for AF ablation. This approach yields a substantial reduction in fluoroscopy time, with the potential to avoid acute complications, compared to a conventional double-TSP strategy.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcatheter ablationcomplicationssafetytransseptal puncture

Identifiers

PMID38075955
PMCPMC10701513
OpenAlexW4388945244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.