ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Leaf, root, and soil microbiomes of an invasive plant,
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Herbivory disrupts invasion-associated phyllosphere and arthropod community shifts in grasslands.iScience · 2026Article
- Differentiation of the Foliar Microbiomes From Co-Occurring Grass Species Reflects Their Recency of Invasion.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Distinct and Intermediate Bacterial Community Structure of the Wasabi Rhizome Based on Compartment-resolved 16S rRNA Gene Profiling.Microbes and environments · 2026Article
- Diversity, bioactivities, and metabolomics of culturable endophytic fungi from the medicinal plantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Developmental stage-specific triterpenoid saponin accumulations inPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- An effluent pump family distributed across plant commensal bacteria conditions host- and organ-specific glucosinolate detoxification.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ecological underpinnings of the invasion success of exotic plants may be found in their interactions with microbes, either through the enemy release hypothesis and the enhanced mutualism hypothesis. Whereas recent high-throughput sequencing techniques have significantly expanded our understanding of plant-associated microbiomes and their functional guilds, few studies to date have used these techniques to compare the microbiome associated with invasive plants between their native and exotic ranges. Methods: We extracted fungal and bacterial DNA within leaf endosphere, root endosphere and soil of an invasive plant, Results: Fungal and bacterial community compositions differed among leaves, roots and soil, and between the native and exotic ranges. Despite a higher microbial diversity in the soil in the exotic range than in the native range, the microbial diversity within leaf and root was lower in the exotic range compared to the native range. In addition, leaves in the native range harbored a greater number of plant pathogenic fungi compared to those in the exotic range. Discussion: These patterns suggest plant controls over what microbes become associated with leaves and roots. The higher abundance of leaf pathogenic fungi, including the pathogen which is known to cause specific disease in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.