Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075899›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Gut microbiota and risk of lower respiratory tract infections: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Wei Liu, Xinyan Wang, Ruizhi Feng, Chen Zhao, Jian Luo, Xiawei Zhang, Xuemei Liu, Mei Yang, Jie Min, Bing Mao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei Liu *Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xinyan Wang *Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ruizhi FengDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chen ZhaoDepartment of Oral Medicine, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration, Stomatological Hospital and Dental School of Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jian LuoRespiratory Medicine Unit and National Institute for Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine Experimental Medicine, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Xiawei ZhangRespiratory Medicine Unit and National Institute for Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine Experimental Medicine, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Xuemei LiuDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mei YangDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie MinDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bing MaoDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hongli JiangDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNNational Institute for Health Research · GBTongji University · CNUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Observational studies have reported the association between gut microbiota and the risk of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). However, whether the association reflects a causal relationship remains obscure. Methods: A bidirectional twosample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted by assessing genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics for gut microbiota taxa and five common LRTIs. MR methods including inverse-variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode were used to analyze the causality. Gene pleiotropy was tested using MR-Egger regression and MR-PRESSO methods. Cochran's Q test was used to check for heterogeneity. Leave-one-out analysis was used to assess the stability of effect sizes. Detected significant associations were validated by using an independent LRTI GWAS summary statistics dataset. An optional MR method of causal analysis using summary effect estimates (CAUSE) was further performed as a validation to avoid potential false-positive results. Results: According to the MR-Egger estimates in forward MR analysis, a causal effect of gut Discussion: This study established no strong causality between genetically predicted gut microbiome and the risk of lower respiratory tract infections. However, specific subtypes of microbial genera, such as

Indexed as

Blautia genuscausal relationshipgut microbiotalower respiratory tract infectionsMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID38075899
PMCPMC10702245
OpenAlexW4388945530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.