ReviewResuscitation plus2023
Wolf Creek XVII Part 1: The future of cardiac arrest resuscitation.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wolf Creek XVIII Part 7: strategies to optimize international collaborations in cardiac arrest research.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Current and emerging innovations in technology, strategy, and artificial intelligence: a new era in cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical heterogeneity and phenotyping of post cardiac arrest brain injury: one size may not fit all.Intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- Wolf Creek XVII Part 6: Physiology-Guided CPR.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
- Wolf creek XVII part 4: Amplifying lay-rescuer response.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
- Wolf Creek XVII Part 8: Neuroprotection.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
- Wolf Creek XVII part 3: Automated cardiac arrest diagnosis.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
- Wolf Creek XVII Part 2: The origin, evolution, and impact of the Wolf Creek Conference.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Wolf Creek Conference, initiated in 1975, is a well-established tradition providing a unique forum for robust intellectual exchange between thought leaders and scientists from academia and industry focused on advancing the science and practice of cardiac arrest resuscitation. The Wolf Creek XVII Conference was hosted by the Max Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA on June 15-17, 2023. A major focus of the conference proceedings was to identify and prioritize the knowledge gaps, barriers to translation, and research priorities for six major domains in the field of resuscitation: (1) automated cardiac arrest diagnosis, (2) amplifying lay-responder response, (3) mobile AEDs, (4) physiology-guided CPR, (5) extracorporeal support, and (6) neuroprotection. In addition, industry scientists were given the opportunity to present and discuss cutting edge innovations. Finally, building off of the conference's theme of "The Future of Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation", the Weil Institute introduced the "Wolf Creek Innovator in Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Award" to recognize early career investigators who were challenging current paradigms in resuscitation science. Similar to the early Wolf Creek Conferences, the goal was to fuel active discussion and debate among leading experts to determine where future research efforts should be focused. This manuscript provides an overview of the Wolf Creek XVII conference, and the individual manuscripts within this special edition of Resuscitation Plus describe the conference proceedings and outcomes in more detail. It is our intent that these publications will provide a roadmap for important academic and commercial advances in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.