Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075657›Full record

ReviewChemical science2023

Advances in CO

Md Nasim Khan, Yara van Ingen, Tribani Boruah, Adam McLauchlan, Thomas Wirth, Rebecca L Melen

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From COAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  5. COJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Energy Decomposition Analysis of the Activation of COThe journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025
    Article
  7. Activation and Fixation of Atmospheric COChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Use of Microwave Dielectric Spectroscopy for theJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Computational design for enantioselective COBeilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Md Nasim KhanCardiff Catalysis Institute, School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Translational Research Hub Maindy Road, Cathays Cardiff CF24 4HQ Cymru/Wales UK MelenR@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-3969
Yara van IngenCardiff Catalysis Institute, School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Translational Research Hub Maindy Road, Cathays Cardiff CF24 4HQ Cymru/Wales UK MelenR@cardiff.ac.uk.
Tribani BoruahCardiff Catalysis Institute, School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Translational Research Hub Maindy Road, Cathays Cardiff CF24 4HQ Cymru/Wales UK MelenR@cardiff.ac.uk.
Adam McLauchlanCardiff Catalysis Institute, School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Translational Research Hub Maindy Road, Cathays Cardiff CF24 4HQ Cymru/Wales UK MelenR@cardiff.ac.uk.
Thomas WirthSchool of Chemistry, Cardiff University Main Building, Park Place Cardiff CF10 3AT Cymru/Wales UK wirthT@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8990-0667
Rebecca L MelenCardiff Catalysis Institute, School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Translational Research Hub Maindy Road, Cathays Cardiff CF24 4HQ Cymru/Wales UK MelenR@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3142-2831
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of CO

Identifiers

PMID38075657
PMCPMC10699552
OpenAlexW4388530270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.