ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2024
Satisfactory outcomes from the double-row fixation procedure for ankle lateral ligaments injury with os subfibulare.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- All-inside arthroscopic procedures for chronic lateral ankle instability: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.British medical bulletin · 2025Guideline
- Enhanced subfibular ossicle diagnosis: CT-MRI integration of morphology and ligament attachments.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ossicles of avulsed fractures of the lateral malleolus can result in pain or chronic ankle instability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the arthroscopic double-row fixation procedure with anatomic ankle lateral ligaments reconstruction for the treatment of ankle lateral ligaments injury with os subfibulare. Methods: This retrospective study included 38 patients with ankle lateral ligaments injury with concomitant os subfibulare who were treated between July 2016 and November 2021. The patients were divided into a double-row fixation group (n = 19) and an ankle lateral ligaments reconstruction group (n = 19). The Karlsson and Peterson Scoring System for Ankle Function (KAFS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Tegner score, visual analog scale (VAS), and anterior drawer test (ADT) were obtained preoperatively and at the last post-operative follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was also performed at the last post-operative follow-up. Results: The KAFS, AOFAS, VAS, and Tegner scores increased significantly after the surgery. Furthermore, the pre- and post-operative functional scores were comparable between the two groups. The ADT was negative in all participants post-operatively. There were no significant differences between the double-row fixation and ligaments reconstruction groups regarding the proportions of patients who achieved a minimally clinically important difference (MCID) in KAFS, AOFAS, and Tegner scores. There was no significant difference in T2 mapping values for the tibial and talar side post-operatively between the two groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences in functional scores post-operatively between bony fusion and non-fusion patients in the double fixation group. Conclusion: The double-row fixation procedure provided similar satisfactory clinical outcomes when compared with lateral ligaments reconstruction for the treatment of ankle lateral ligaments injury with os subfibulare over a short follow-up duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.