Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075520›Full record

ReviewThe journal of medicine access

Overcoming structural barriers to diffusion of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Manya Magnus, Hannah Yellin, Kayley Langlands, Madhu Balachandran, Melissa Turner, Jeanne Jordan, Daniel Ramin, Irene Kuo, Marc Siegel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of medicine access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manya MagnusDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6359-987X
Hannah YellinDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Kayley LanglandsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty Associates, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Madhu BalachandranDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Melissa TurnerInfectious Diseases Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Jeanne JordanDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Daniel RaminDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Irene KuoDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Marc SiegelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty Associates, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

The District of Columbia Clinical Trials Unit (DC CTU)UM1AI154466 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Sarah Henn, Manya Magnus · 2021 to 2026
$12.5M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI154466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV prevention with antiretroviral medication in the form of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers a critical tool to halt the HIV pandemic. Barriers to PrEP access across drug types, formulations, and delivery systems share remarkable commonalities and are likely to be generalizable to future novel PrEP strategies. Appreciation of these barriers allows for planning earlier in the drug-development pathway rather than waiting for the demonstration of efficacy. The purpose of this article is to propose a core set of considerations that should be included in the drug-development process for future PrEP interventions. A literature synthesis of key barriers to PrEP uptake in the United States was conducted to elucidate commonalities across PrEP agents and delivery methods. Based on the published literature, we divided challenges into three main categories of structural barriers: (1) provider and clinic characteristics; (2) cost considerations; and (3) disparities and social constructs, with potential solutions provided for each. Pragmatic strategies for examining and overcoming these barriers before future PrEP regulatory approval are recommended. If these strategies are considered well before the time of commercial availability, the potential for PrEP to interrupt the HIV pandemic will be greatly enhanced.

Indexed as

HIV preventionPre-exposure prophylaxisprovidersregulatory pathwaysstructural barriers

Identifiers

PMID38075520
PMCPMC10702399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.