Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075519›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2023

Applicability of fractional anisotropy from standardized automated tractography for outcome prediction of patients after stroke.

Tetsuo Koyama, Midori Mochizuki, Yuki Uchiyama, Kazuhisa Domen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tetsuo KoyamaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nishinomiya Kyoritsu Neurosurgical Hospital: 11-1 Imazu-Yamanaka-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8211, Japan.
Midori MochizukiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nishinomiya Kyoritsu Neurosurgical Hospital: 11-1 Imazu-Yamanaka-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8211, Japan.
Yuki UchiyamaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Japan.
Kazuhisa DomenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Japan.
Hyogo University · JPNishinomiya Kyoritsu Neurosurgical Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] Diffusion-tensor fractional anisotropy has been used for outcome prediction in stroke patients. We assessed the clinical applicability of the two major fractional anisotropy methodologies-fractional anisotropy derived from segmentation maps in the standard brain (region of interest) and fractional anisotropy derived from standardized automated tractography-in relation to outcomes. [Participants and Methods] The study design was a retrospective survey of medical records collected from October 2021 to September 2022. Diffusion-tensor imaging was conducted in the second week after stroke onset. Outcomes were assessed using the total score of the motor component of the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (null to full, 0 to 25). Correlations between fractional anisotropy and the outcomes were then assessed. [Results] Fourteen patients with hemorrhagic stroke were sampled. The fractional anisotropy from standardized automated tractography of the corticospinal tract on the lesion side (mean ± standard deviation, 0.403 ± 0.070) was significantly and tightly correlated (

Indexed as

PredictionPrognosisTractography

Identifiers

PMID38075519
PMCPMC10698312
OpenAlexW4389170708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.