Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075401›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2023

Locating an iliac cortical window for reduction of an acetabular dome impaction: A computed tomography and cadaveric study.

Rahat Jarayabhand, Chittawee Jiamton, Apipop Kritsaneephaiboon, Theerachai Apivatthakakul

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Reduction techniques for acetabular fractures].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  2. Quadrilateral plate fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
  3. Articular impactions in acetabular fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rahat JarayabhandDepartment of Orthopaedics, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chittawee JiamtonDepartment of Orthopedics, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand.
Apipop KritsaneephaiboonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, SongKla, Thailand.
Theerachai ApivatthakakulDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital · THChiang Mai University · THLerdsin Hospital · THPrince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the optimal location of the iliac cortical window (ICW) for the direct reduction of acetabular dome impactions using a reference bony landmark. Methods: In the first part of the study, computed tomography scans of 10 normal acetabula, the femoral head weight bearing area, were projected through the superior iliac cortical surface perpendicular to the plane of the true pelvis to show the area that corresponds to the acetabular dome. A line connecting each pair of anterior inferior iliac spines (AIIS) was drawn then reflected in the superior surface of the acetabulum and a reference point (RP) was marked on the line halfway between the AIIS and the pelvic brim. A 12-point 1-cm interval grid with horizontal and vertical axes labeled A, B, C and 1 to 4, respectively, overlying the acetabular surface projection was created to identify the location of the acetabular dome. In the second part of the study, the 12-point grid was marked on eight fresh cadavers (16 acetabula) and the same acetabular dome reference point was identified. K-wires were drilled into the acetabula using a parallel drill guide at each of the twelve grid points. An arthrotomy was carried out and the locations of the K-wires which penetrated the acetabular dome were recorded. Results: The average distance from the AIIS to the medial pelvic brim in the CT scans and cadaveric study were 47.7 and 45.9 mm, respectively. The K-wires at grid points B2 and C1 had a 100% correlation to the dome area. The A2, B1, and C2 grid points had a correlation with the dome area of >80%. The remaining grid points had joint penetrations ranging from 6.25% to 62.5%. Conclusion: The proposed RP, which can be easily identified intraoperatively, and the area 1 cm

Indexed as

Acetabular fractureDome impactionIliac cortical windowReduction

Identifiers

PMID38075401
PMCPMC10698530
OpenAlexW4389003455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.