ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
List2Net: Linking multiple lists of biological data in a network context.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: A common task in scientific research is the comparison of lists or sets of diverse biological entities such as biomolecules, ontologies, sequences and expression profiles. Such comparisons rely, one way or another, on calculating a measure of similarity either by means of vector correlation metrics, set operations such as union and intersection, or specific measures to capture, for example, sequence homology. Subsequently, depending on the data type, the results are often visualized using heatmaps, Venn, Euler, or Alluvial diagrams. While most of the abovementioned representations offer simplicity and interpretability, their effectiveness holds only for a limited number of lists and specific data types. Conversely, network representations provide a more versatile approach where data lists are viewed as interconnected nodes, with edges representing pairwise commonality, correlation, or any other similarity metric. Networks can represent an arbitrary number of lists of any data type, offering a holistic perspective and most importantly, enabling analytics for characterizing and discovering novel insights in terms of centralities, clusters and motifs that can exist in such networks. While several tools that implement the translation of lists to the various commonly used diagrams, such as Venn and Euler, have been developed, a similar tool that can parse, analyze the commonalities and generate networks from an arbitrary number of lists of the same or heterogenous content does not exist. Results: To address this gap, we introduce
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.