ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2023
Quantitative Analysis of Morphometric Changes in Feminization Rhinoplasty Utilizing a Standardized Forehead-Rhinoplasty Technique.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complication Rates in Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Construct Validity of the GENDER-Q Face and Neck Scales in 4890 Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Provision of gender-affirming care for trans and gender-diverse adults: a systematic review of health and quality of life outcomes, values and preferences, and costs.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Simulation Accuracy and Patient Satisfaction With Rhinoplasty.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed facial gender-affirming surgeries (FGASs) for transgender females, but well-established morphometric parameters describing feminizing nasal changes do not exist. Objectives: Describe the author's technique for feminization rhinoplasty, analyze the changes in 3-dimensional nasal anthropomorphic parameters, and describe patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Three-dimensional photogrammetric evaluation was performed both preoperatively and postoperatively in transgender female patients who underwent FGAS. Measurements assessed included the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, dorsal height, mid-dorsal width, alar width, nasal tip width, and tip projection. Patients were surveyed preoperatively and postoperatively using the FACE-Q Nose module. Paired Results: Twenty patients underwent FGAS during the study period. The average time between surgery and postoperative 3-dimensional images was 13.6 ± 6.8 months. The nasofrontal angle increased by 8.2° (148.0 ± 7.4° to 156.1 ± 6.7°, Conclusions: There were statistically significant changes in the nasofrontal angle, tip projection, dorsal height, mid-dorsal width, and tip width in patients receiving feminization rhinoplasty. These data may help surgeons with preoperative planning and intraoperative decision making. Level of Evidence 4:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.