Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075271›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Pain neuroscience education in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review.

Ferran Cuenca-Martínez, Luis Suso-Martí, Joaquín Calatayud, Francisco José Ferrer-Sargues, Vicente Muñoz-Alarcos, Patricio Alba-Quesada, Gemma Biviá-Roig

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07393347 (Pain Neuroscience Education for the Management of Chronic Pain in Elite Volleyball Players With Chronic Shoulder Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07393347 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pain Neuroscience Education for the Management of Chronic Pain in Elite Volleyball Players With Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPamukkale UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsPain Management, Sport Injuries, Volleyball PlayerArmsPain neuroscience education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Healing vs. hurting words: the power of language in pain perception-a narrative review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ferran Cuenca-MartínezDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Luis Suso-MartíDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Joaquín CalatayudDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Francisco José Ferrer-SarguesDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Vicente Muñoz-AlarcosDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Patricio Alba-QuesadaDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Gemma Biviá-RoigDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, pain neuroscience education (PNE) has been the focus of extensive research in the scientific literature in the field of physical therapy, but the results obtained are controversial and its clinical application remains unclear. The main aim of this umbrella review was to assess the effectiveness of PNE in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). Methods: We searched systematically in PubMed (Medline), PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO. Methodological quality was analyzed using AMSTAR-2 scale and overlapping analysis using GROOVE tool. Results: 16 systematic reviews were included. A qualitative synthesis was performed for the following sets of patients with CMP: overall CMP, chronic spinal pain, patients with fibromyalgia and patients with osteoarthritis. In general terms, it seems that the addition of the PNE-based intervention to other treatments, mostly exercise-based interventions although we might refer to it in terms of a multimodal approach, leads to greater clinical improvements than the multimodal approach alone. We have found this especially in the reduction of the influence of psychosocial variables. However, it seems that studies testing the effectiveness of PNE in isolation, systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis did not show statistically significant improvements overall in terms of pain intensity, disability levels or psychosocial variables. Discussion: There is a great heterogeneity in the results obtained and the PNE protocols used, a critically low quality in the reviews included and a very high overlap, so there is a need to improve the studies in this field before clinical application. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD42022355634).

Indexed as

chronic musculoskeletal painmusculoskeletal painpain educationpain neuroscience educationumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID38075271
PMCPMC10704151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.