Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075248›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy oncolytics2023

Pre-treatment with systemic agents for advanced NSCLC elicits changes in the phenotype of autologous T cell therapy products.

Charlotte O'Brien Gore, Amy Billman, Suchete Hunjan, Jayne Colebrook, Desmond Choy, Wilson Li, Jack Haynes, Jennifer Wade, Emily Hobern, Louisa McDonald and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy oncolytics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Driving CAR-T cells toward solid lung tumors.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Tumor-associated CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte O'Brien GoreSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Amy BillmanAnalytical Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, GSK Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage, SG1 2NY Hertfordshire, UK.
Suchete HunjanOncology Cell Therapy Unit, GSK Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage, SG1 2NY Hertfordshire, UK.
Jayne ColebrookProduct Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, GSK Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage, SG1 2NY Hertfordshire, UK.
Desmond ChoySchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Wilson LiProduct Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, GSK Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage, SG1 2NY Hertfordshire, UK.
Jack HaynesProduct Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, GSK Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage, SG1 2NY Hertfordshire, UK.
Jennifer WadeProduct Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, GSK Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage, SG1 2NY Hertfordshire, UK.
Emily HobernProduct Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, GSK Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage, SG1 2NY Hertfordshire, UK.
Louisa McDonaldOncology & Hematology Clinical Trials (OHCT), Guy's Hospital, 1st Floor Chapel Wing, Great Maze Pond, SE1 9RT London, UK.
Sophie PapaSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Martijn BrugmanAnalytical Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, GSK Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage, SG1 2NY Hertfordshire, UK.
Shahram KordastiSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Claudia Montiel-EquihuaProduct Development, Cell and Gene Therapy, GSK Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage, SG1 2NY Hertfordshire, UK.
Age UK · GBKing's College London · GBGuy's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antitumor activity of adoptive T cell therapies (ACT) is highly dependent on the expansion, persistence, and continued activity of adoptively transferred cells. Clinical studies using ACTs have revealed that products that possess and maintain less differentiated phenotypes, including memory and precursor T cells, show increased antitumor efficacy and superior patient outcomes owing to their increased expansion, persistence, and ability to differentiate into effector progeny that elicit antitumor responses. Strategies that drive the differentiation into memory or precursor-type T cell subsets with high potential for persistence and self-renewal will enhance adoptively transferred T cell maintenance and promote durable antitumor efficacy. Because of the high costs associated with ACT manufacturing, ACTs are often only offered to patients after multiple rounds of systemic therapy. An essential factor to consider in producing autologous ACT medicinal products is the impact of the patient's initial T cell fitness and subtype composition, which will likely differ with age, disease history, and treatment with prior anti-cancer therapies. This study evaluated the impact of systemic anti-cancer therapy for non-small cell lung cancer treatment on the T cell phenotype of the patient at baseline and the quality and characteristics of the genetically modified autologous T cell therapy product after manufacturing.

Indexed as

adoptive T cell therapycancer immunotherapyCAR-T cellscell therapyimmunotherapynon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID38075248
PMCPMC10701366
OpenAlexW4388569193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.