Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075203›Full record

ArticleNon-coding RNA research2024

Multi-omics approach for identifying CNV-associated lncRNA signatures with prognostic value in prostate cancer.

Neetu Tyagi, Shikha Roy, Krishnan Vengadesan, Dinesh Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Non-coding RNA research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Non-coding RNA-mediated gene regulation in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis: molecular insights and emerging innovations.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neetu TyagiTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India.
Shikha RoyTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India.
Krishnan VengadesanRegional Centre for Biotechnology, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Dinesh GuptaTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India.
International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · INRegional Centre for Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer, the second most prevalent malignancy among men, poses a significant threat to affected patients' well-being due to its poor prognosis. Novel biomarkers are required to enhance clinical outcomes and tailor personalized treatments. Herein, we describe our research to explore the prognostic value of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) deregulated by copy number variations (CNVs) in prostate cancer. Methods: The study employed an integrative multi-omics data analysis of the prostate cancer transcriptomic, CNV and methylation datasets to identify prognosis-related subtypes. Subtype-specific expression profiles of protein-coding genes (PCGs) and lncRNAs were determined. We analysed CNV patterns of lncRNAs across the genome to identify subtype-specific lncRNAs with CNV changes. LncRNAs exhibiting significant amplification or deletion and a positive correlation were designated CNV-deregulated lncRNAs. A prognostic risk score model was subsequently developed using these CNV-driven lncRNAs. Results: Six molecular subtypes of prostate cancer were identified, demonstrating significant differences in prognosis (P = 0.034). The CNV profiles of subtype-specific lncRNAs were examined, revealing their correlation with CNV amplification or deletion. Six lncRNAs (CCAT2, LINC01593, LINC00276, GACAT2, LINC00457, LINC01343) were selected based on significant CNV amplifications or deletions using a rigorous univariate Cox proportional risk regression model. A robust risk score model was developed, stratifying patients into high-risk and low-risk categories. Notably, our prognostic model based on these six lncRNAs exhibited exceptional predictive capabilities for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in prostate cancer patients (P = 0.024). Conclusions: Our study successfully identified a prognostic risk score model comprising six CNV-driven lncRNAs that could potentially be prognostic biomarkers for prostate cancer. These lncRNA signatures are closely associated with RFS, providing promising prospects for improved patient prognostication and personalized therapeutic strategies for novel prostate cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Copy number variationsLong-non coding RNAsMulti-omics analysisPrognostic biomarkersProstate cancerSubtypes

Identifiers

PMID38075203
PMCPMC10700122
OpenAlexW4387491564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.