Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075045›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Development and external validation of dual online tools for prognostic assessment in elderly patients with high-grade glioma: a comprehensive study using SEER and Chinese cohorts.

Hongyu Zhang, Xinzhan Jiang, Fubin Ren, Qiang Gu, Jiahao Yao, Xinyu Wang, Shuhuai Zou, Yifan Gan, Jianheng Gu, Yongji Xu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongyu ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xinzhan JiangDepartment of Neurobiology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Fubin RenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Qiang GuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jiahao YaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xinyu WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Shuhuai ZouDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yifan GanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jianheng GuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yongji XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hulin People's Hospital, Jixi, Heilongjiang, China.
Zhao WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Shuang LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xuefeng WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Baojian WeiSchool of Nursing, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, Shandong, China.
Harbin Medical University · CNChungnam National University · KRShandong First Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Elderly individuals diagnosed with high-grade gliomas frequently experience unfavorable outcomes. We aimed to design two web-based instruments for prognosis to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), assisting clinical decision-making. Methods: We scrutinized data from the SEER database on 5,245 elderly patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma between 2000-2020, segmenting them into training (3,672) and validation (1,573) subsets. An additional external validation cohort was obtained from our institution. Prognostic determinants were pinpointed using Cox regression analyses, which facilitated the construction of the nomogram. The nomogram's predictive precision for OS and CSS was gauged using calibration and ROC curves, the C-index, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Based on risk scores, patients were stratified into high or low-risk categories, and survival disparities were explored. Results: Using multivariate Cox regression, we identified several prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in elderly patients with high-grade gliomas, including age, tumor location, size, surgical technique, and therapies. Two digital nomograms were formulated anchored on these determinants. For OS, the C-index values in the training, internal, and external validation cohorts were 0.734, 0.729, and 0.701, respectively. We also derived AUC values for 3-, 6-, and 12-month periods. For CSS, the C-index values for the training and validation groups were 0.733 and 0.727, with analogous AUC metrics. The efficacy and clinical relevance of the nomograms were corroborated via ROC curves, calibration plots, and DCA for both cohorts. Conclusion: Our investigation pinpointed pivotal risk factors in elderly glioma patients, leading to the development of an instrumental prognostic nomogram for OS and CSS. This instrument offers invaluable insights to optimize treatment strategies.

Indexed as

GliomaNomogramsAgedAsian PeopleChinaHumansPrognosiscancer-specific survivalexternal validationhigh-grade gliomaoverall survivalSEERweb-based prognostic nomogram

Identifiers

PMID38075045
PMCPMC10702965
OpenAlexW4388946400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.