Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38075017›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

Comparison of Blood-Based Shotgun and Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing for Microbiological Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis.

Laure Flurin, Cody R Fisher, Matthew J Wolf, Bobbi S Pritt, Daniel C DeSimone, Robin Patel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel Diagnostic Methods for Infective Endocarditis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laure FlurinDivisions of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-1081
Cody R FisherDivisions of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-1078
Matthew J WolfDivisions of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Bobbi S PrittDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0261-1326
Daniel C DeSimoneDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-0283
Robin PatelDivisions of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6344-4141
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shotgun and targeted metagenomic sequencing have been shown in separate studies to be potentially useful for culture-free pathogen identification in blood and/or plasma of patients with infective endocarditis (IE). However, the 2 approaches have not been directly compared. The aim of this study was to compare shotgun metagenomic sequencing with targeted metagenomic sequencing (tMGS) for organism identification in blood or plasma of patients with IE. Methods: Patients with possible or definite IE were prospectively enrolled from October 2020 to July 2021. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed with the Karius test, which uses microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing to detect, identify, and quantitate DNA-based pathogens in plasma. tMGS was performed using a 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) polymerase chain reaction assay targeting the V1 to V3 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Results were compared using the McNemar test of paired proportions. Results: Samples from 34 patients were investigated. The Karius test was positive in 24/34 (71%), including 3/6 (50%) with blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE), which was not significantly different from the positivity rate of tMGS ( Conclusions: The Karius test and tMGS yielded comparable detection rates; however, beyond organism identification, the Karius test generated potentially useful antibiotic resistance data.

Indexed as

infective endocarditisnext-generation sequencingshotgun metagenomicstargeted metagenomicsthe Karius test

Identifiers

PMID38075017
PMCPMC10709542
OpenAlexW4388386918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.