ArticleInfectious medicine2022
Determination of the predictive factors for diagnostic positivity of nucleic acid amplification tests for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in Infectious medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age-period-cohort study of active pulmonary tuberculosis in eastern China: analysis of 15-year surveillance data.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Global, regional, and national burden of HIV-negative tuberculosis, 1990-2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major threat to human health, and TB diagnostic methods remain unsatisfactory. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) show higher sensitivity compared with culture for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB). However, NAATs are expensive and cannot be easily implemented outside major medical centers. To improve the sensitivity of NAATs for PTB diagnosis, we investigated the predictive factors that might optimize NAAT utilization. Methods: A total of 1263 patients with suspected PTB were enrolled for evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of methods including smear-microbiology, culture of Mtb and NAAT for Results: NAAT showed higher sensitivity for Mtb detection (61.1%) when compared with smear (9.0%) and Mtb culture (47.8%). We found that an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, the presence of cavities, and positive interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) results were indicative of positive Mtb detection by NAAT. Moreover, individuals who had all three of these characteristics showed an 86% diagnostic positivity for PTB from Mtb detection by NAAT. Conclusions: Our study suggests that an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, a positive IGRA result, and the presence of pulmonary cavities are helpful factors for predicting positive Mtb detection by NAAT. Patients with the three positive clinical markers should undergo NAAT for Mtb detection because they are the most likely individuals to be bacteriologically confirmed as having TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.