Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074941›Full record

ArticleAnimal reproduction2023

Reproductive evaluation of Luisa, the last jaguar of the Caatinga.

Letícia Alecho Requena, Thiago Cavalheri Luczinski, Anneliese de Souza Traldi, Thyara de Deco-Souza, Gediendson Ribeiro de Araújo, Cristiane Schilbach Pizzutto, Giovana Martins Miranda, Mirna Ribeiro Porto, Maitê Cardoso Coelho da Silva, Pedro Nacib Jorge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal reproduction, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reproductive Results of Selected Cat Breeds.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Letícia Alecho RequenaInstituto Reprocon, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7695-567X
Thiago Cavalheri LuczinskiInstituto Reprocon, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4101-0470
Anneliese de Souza TraldiInstituto Reprocon, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-7828
Thyara de Deco-SouzaInstituto Reprocon, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5157-3605
Gediendson Ribeiro de AraújoInstituto Reprocon, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-6460-946X
Cristiane Schilbach PizzuttoInstituto Reprocon, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4357-5133
Giovana Martins MirandaFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-0203-500X
Mirna Ribeiro PortoFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Centro Universitário de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-0491-2045
Maitê Cardoso Coelho da SilvaInstituto Reprocon, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-0047-3911
Pedro Nacib JorgeInstituto Reprocon, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-0148
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversity Center of Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The

Indexed as

biobankingCaatinga biomeconservationlaparoscopic evaluationovaries

Identifiers

PMID38074941
PMCPMC10707538
OpenAlexW4388827943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.