ArticleIranian journal of child neurology2023
Gap pre-pulse inhibition of the cortical auditory evoked potentials as a possible objective tinnitus assessment tool.
Article in Iranian journal of child neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective assessment tests overcome the variability of subjective methods. Cortical recordings with gap pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex stimulus have been used as objective tinnitus assessments in humans. This study aims to investigate this possible objective tinnitus test and compare gap-induced inhibition in different stimulus parameters and brain regions. Materials & Methods: Twenty People (18-50 years old) without hearing loss and tinnitus were included. The sound stimuli consisted of continuous background noise with a loud startle tone preceded by a silent gap (20 and 40 ms duration, 120 and 150 ms distance from the startle). The N1-P2 complex amplitude and topoplot maps were extracted in 27-channel cortical response recording after signal processing. Four brain regions of interest (ROI) of anterior-frontal, centro-frontal, right, and left temporal were investigated. Results: The results showed that the maximum inhibition occurred in a 40 ms gap duration and 150 ms distance in all 4 ROIs. In comparing ROIs, the centro-frontal and left temporal regions revealed the most inhibition (p<0.05). The decrease in the amplitude of the N1 and P2 in that region could also be traced in the 100 and 200 ms topoplots. Conclusion: Gap-induced inhibition was observed in all gap-embedded stimuli and all ROIs. However, the 40-150 mode and centro-frontal and left temporal regions had maximum inhibition in normal subjects. It provides a promising tool for objectively assessing tinnitus in humans with particular implications in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.