Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074874›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Breast cancer classification based on convolutional neural network and image fusion approaches using ultrasound images.

Mohammed Alotaibi, Abdulrhman Aljouie, Najd Alluhaidan, Wasem Qureshi, Hessa Almatar, Reema Alduhayan, Barrak Alsomaie, Ahmed Almazroa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wavelet Spectrum in a Multi-Channel Network May Reduce Biopsy Rates on Diagnosis of Breast Tumors With BI-RADS Category 4a or Higher.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed AlotaibiComputer Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrhman AljouieAI and Bioinformatics Department, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Najd AlluhaidanMedical Imaging Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia.
Wasem QureshiAI and Bioinformatics Department, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Hessa AlmatarImaging Research Department, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Reema AlduhayanImaging Research Department, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Barrak AlsomaieImaging Research Department, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AlmazroaImaging Research Department, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning and image processing are used to classify and segment breast tumor images, specifically in ultrasound (US) modalities, to support clinical decisions and improve healthcare quality. However, directly using US images can be challenging due to noise and diverse imaging modalities. In this study, we developed a three-step image processing scheme involving speckle noise filtering using a block-matching three-dimensional filtering technique, region of interest highlighting, and RGB fusion. This method enhances the generalization of deep-learning models and achieves better performance. We used a deep learning model (VGG19) to perform transfer learning on three datasets: BUSI (780 images), Dataset B (162 images), and KAIMRC (5693 images). When tested on the BUSI and KAIMRC datasets using a fivefold cross-validation mechanism, the model with the proposed preprocessing step performed better than without preprocessing for each dataset. The proposed image processing approach improves the performance of the breast cancer deep learning classification model. Multiple diverse datasets (private and public) were used to generalize the model for clinical application.

Indexed as

Big breast cancer dataDeep learningImage processingKAIMRCVGG19

Identifiers

PMID38074874
PMCPMC10700613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.