ArticleHeliyon2023
Developing a novel SARS-CoV-2 risk index to predict the prognostic and therapeutic effects in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The signature of SARS-CoV-2-related genes predicts the immune therapeutic response and prognosis in breast cancer.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is growing evidence of a strong association between SARS-CoV-2 and cancer prognosis and treatment outcome. However, there are no reliable SARS-CoV-2 assessment models to accurately predict prognostic and therapeutic effects in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, differentially expressed genes associated with SARS-CoV-2 were detected, and multiple Cox regression methods were used to construct a SARS-CoV-2 risk index (SC2RI). Then, RT-qPCR was used to validate the gene expression levels in the AML samples. Finally, we explored how the SC2RI affected prognosis, immune infiltration, immunotherapy, and drug sensitivity in AML. We found that CYB5R3 and CLIP4 had been confirmed as hub genes in AML and were used to generate the SC2RI. The datasets indicated that the SC2RI had a superior predictive impact on the prognosis of AML. In addition, high expression of immune checkpoints and numerous immunological infiltrations were substantially correlated with a high SC2RI. However, it responded poorly to immune checkpoint blockade, which may be related to T-cell dysfunction, lack of effective antigens, and deficiency of synaptic capacity. Moreover, a high SC2RI was less susceptible to mTOR-related pathway medications but more sensitive to cell cycle suppressors. Therefore, categorization based on SC2RI could enhance the prognostic prediction of AML and help identify novel therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.